There has been a lot of
discussion lately about the integrity of the entire SSL Certificate
industry thanks in part to Symantec’s decision to cheapen the trust
level of one of their best products – VeriSign’s SSL Certificate
software.
In case you’ve lived
under a rock for the past few months, back in April of this year,
Symantec, who owns both Norton and VeriSign SSL Certificate software
products made the decision to change the highly regarded VeriSign SSL
Checkmark of approval to the less-than-reliable Norton Secured Seal.
This decision instantly caused a panic for those who take internet
security seriously. It also developed quite a cult following of
people who previously hated Norton for several other reasons to jump
on the Hate Symantec bandwagon.
Maybe I’m a bit
paranoid, but when I shop online, the first thing I do is check to
see if the website is protected by a reliable SSL Certificate. This
blocks any hackers from logging onto the website when I’m entering
my private banking information to purchase a product and then steal
my identity or private info. If I don’t see a reliable SSL
Certificate, I don’t buy – it’s really that simple.
The funny thing is that
I’m not alone in this philosophy. Several million online shoppers
base their entire online habits based on trusting that a website or
online company has their safety and security top of mind. This is
what VeriSign established for several years with their highly
trustworthy Checkmark. And sadly what Symantec destroyed with one
quick decision in April 2012 to replace their best marketing tool
with a bag of crap.
And that’s precisely
what the Norton Secured Seal is – a crappy guarantee for a product
that simply does not work to protect consumers online as well as the
VeriSign product has done in the past.
The question that needs
to be asked is why did Symantec make this decision? Was it about ego
and trying to brand Norton (their pet project) and destroy the
VeriSign Brand? If so, that was a really lame decision on their part.
I don’t want to act like I know it all, and I certainly don’t own
a huge SSL Security Software company (but I did stay at a Holiday Inn
Express last night which makes me qualified), but it seems to me the
better philosophy would be to place the highly trusted VeriSign
Checkmark on Norton products – not the other way around.
I’m certain had they
done this, the Hate Norton blogs would be shorter than they currently
are and that Symantec would actually be a reliable and trusted
company. Sadly, they didn’t sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last the
night before making this cataclysmic business branding decision and
several online shoppers and companies are striking back.
Several industry leading
websites that used to be protected with SSL Certificates are naked
now with zero online protection. Internet sales are dropping due to
this business decision and frankly many people who own online
companies are searching for a reliable company who can provide their
customers with a safe place to conduct business.
Again, perhaps I’m
paranoid, but honestly, I don’t trust my Symantec SSL Certificate
any longer and will be making a change to another reliable company
very soon. Any suggestions on what product I should use would be
helpful.
Well, SSL is still the best way to recognize a secure connection!! I don't think there is a better way!! http://www.vpswebserver.com/windows-vps/ssl-certificates-for-secure-websites-and-satisfied-clients
ReplyDeleteI recommend your decision to change the product will certainly congratulate that is upcoming and hope that will be helpful like SSL.
ReplyDeleteHere is recommending for security company